Hi Robin,
On 5/8/19 7:20 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 08/04/2019 13:19, Eric Auger wrote:
>> When a stage 1 related fault event is read from the event queue,
>> let's propagate it to potential external fault listeners, ie. users
>> who registered a fault handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v4 -> v5:
>> - s/IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_INST/IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index 8044445bc32a..1fd320788dcb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -167,6 +167,26 @@
>> #define ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG1 0xd8
>> #define ARM_SMMU_PRIQ_IRQ_CFG2 0xdc
>> +/* Events */
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_UUT 0x01
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STREAMID 0x02
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STE_FETCH 0x03
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STE 0x04
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_BAD_ATS_TREQ 0x05
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STREAM_DISABLED 0x06
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSL_FORBIDDEN 0x07
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID 0x08
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CD_FETCH 0x09
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_CD 0x0a
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_WALK_EABT 0x0b
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSLATION 0x10
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ADDR_SIZE 0x11
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ACCESS 0x12
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_PERMISSION 0x13
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TLB_CONFLICT 0x20
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CFG_CONFLICT 0x21
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_EVT_E_PAGE_REQUEST 0x24
>> +
>> /* Common MSI config fields */
>> #define MSI_CFG0_ADDR_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 2)
>> #define MSI_CFG2_SH GENMASK(5, 4)
>> @@ -332,6 +352,15 @@
>> #define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 7
>> #define EVTQ_0_ID GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
>> +#define EVTQ_0_SSV GENMASK_ULL(11, 11)
>> +#define EVTQ_0_SUBSTREAMID GENMASK_ULL(31, 12)
>> +#define EVTQ_0_STREAMID GENMASK_ULL(63, 32)
>> +#define EVTQ_1_PNU GENMASK_ULL(33, 33)
>> +#define EVTQ_1_IND GENMASK_ULL(34, 34)
>> +#define EVTQ_1_RNW GENMASK_ULL(35, 35)
>> +#define EVTQ_1_S2 GENMASK_ULL(39, 39)
>> +#define EVTQ_1_CLASS GENMASK_ULL(40, 41)
>> +#define EVTQ_3_FETCH_ADDR GENMASK_ULL(51, 3)
>> /* PRI queue */
>> #define PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS 2
>> @@ -639,6 +668,64 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
>> spinlock_t devices_lock;
>> };
>> +/* fault propagation */
>> +
>> +#define IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS (IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID | \
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PERM_VALID | \
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_ADDR_VALID)
>> +
>> +struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data {
>> + enum iommu_fault_reason reason;
>> + bool s1_check;
>> + u32 fields; /* IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_*_VALID bits */
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Describes how SMMU faults translate into generic IOMMU faults
>> + * and if they need to be reported externally
>> + */
>> +static const struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data
>> fault_propagation[] = {
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_UUT] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STREAMID] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STE_FETCH] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_STE] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_BAD_ATS_TREQ] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_STREAM_DISABLED] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSL_FORBIDDEN] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PASID_INVALID,
>> + false,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CD_FETCH] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PASID_FETCH,
>> + false,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID |
>
> It doesn't make sense to presume validity here, or in any of the faults
> below...
>
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_C_BAD_CD] =
>> {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_BAD_PASID_ENTRY,
>> + false,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_WALK_EABT] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_WALK_EABT, true,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS |
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TRANSLATION] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PTE_FETCH,
>> true,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ADDR_SIZE] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_OOR_ADDRESS,
>> true,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_ACCESS] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_ACCESS, true,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_PERMISSION] = {IOMMU_FAULT_REASON_PERMISSION,
>> true,
>> + IOMMU_FAULT_F_FIELDS
>> + },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_TLB_CONFLICT] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_F_CFG_CONFLICT] = { },
>> +[ARM_SMMU_EVT_E_PAGE_REQUEST] = { },
>> +};
>> +
>> struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
>> u32 opt;
>> const char *prop;
>> @@ -1258,7 +1345,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_l2_strtab(struct
>> arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -__maybe_unused
>> static struct arm_smmu_master_data *
>> arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
>> {
>> @@ -1284,24 +1370,85 @@ arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device
>> *smmu, u32 sid)
>> return master;
>> }
>> +/* Populates the record fields according to the input SMMU event */
>> +static bool arm_smmu_transcode_fault(u64 *evt, u8 type,
>> + struct iommu_fault_unrecoverable *record)
>> +{
>> + const struct arm_smmu_fault_propagation_data *data;
>> + u32 fields;
>> +
>> + if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(fault_propagation))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + data = &fault_propagation[type];
>> + if (!data->reason)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + fields = data->fields;
>> +
>> + if (data->s1_check & FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_S2, evt[1]))
>> + return false; /* S2 related fault, don't propagate */
>> +
>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID) {
>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SSV, evt[0]))
>> + record->pasid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SUBSTREAMID, evt[0]);
>> + else
>> + fields &= ~IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PASID_VALID;
>
> ...because this logic then breaks for C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID, which ends up
> coming out of here *without* reporting the offending PASID.
Correct.
>
>> + }
>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_PERM_VALID) {
>> + if (!FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_RNW, evt[1]))
>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_WRITE;
>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_PNU, evt[1]))
>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_PRIV;
>> + if (FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_IND, evt[1]))
>> + record->perm |= IOMMU_FAULT_PERM_EXEC;
>> + }
>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_ADDR_VALID)
>> + record->addr = evt[2];
>> +
>> + if (fields & IOMMU_FAULT_UNRECOV_FETCH_ADDR_VALID)
>> + record->fetch_addr = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_3_FETCH_ADDR, evt[3]);
>> +
>> + record->flags = fields;
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void arm_smmu_report_event(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64
>> *evt)
>> +{
>> + u32 sid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_STREAMID, evt[0]);
>> + u8 type = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_ID, evt[0]);
>> + struct arm_smmu_master_data *master;
>> + struct iommu_fault_event event = {};
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + master = arm_smmu_find_master(smmu, sid);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!master))
>> + return;
>
> NAK. If I'm getting global faults like C_BAD_STE where a device almost
> certainly *isn't* configured (because hey, we would have initialised its
> STEs if we knew), then I sure as hell want to see the actual faults.
> Spamming a constant stream of stack traces *instead* of showing them is
> worse than useless.
Sure, if !master I will output the original traces.
>
>> +
>> + event.fault.type = IOMMU_FAULT_DMA_UNRECOV;
>> +
>> + if (arm_smmu_transcode_fault(evt, type, &event.fault.event)) {
>> + iommu_report_device_fault(master->dev, &event);
>> + return;
>
> And again, the vast majority of the time, there won't be a fault handler
> registered, so unconditionally suppressing the most common and useful
> stuff like translation and permission faults is very much not OK.
Going to test whether we are in nested mode before entering that path.
Thanks!
Eric
>
> Robin.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(smmu->dev, "event 0x%02x received:\n", type);
>> + for (i = 0; i < EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS; ++i) {
>> + dev_info(smmu->dev, "\t0x%016llx\n",
>> + (unsigned long long)evt[i]);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> /* IRQ and event handlers */
>> static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
>> {
>> - int i;
>> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
>> struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->evtq.q;
>> u64 evt[EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS];
>> do {
>> - while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt)) {
>> - u8 id = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_ID, evt[0]);
>> -
>> - dev_info(smmu->dev, "event 0x%02x received:\n", id);
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(evt); ++i)
>> - dev_info(smmu->dev, "\t0x%016llx\n",
>> - (unsigned long long)evt[i]);
>> -
>> - }
>> + while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt))
>> + arm_smmu_report_event(smmu, evt);
>> /*
>> * Not much we can do on overflow, so scream and pretend we're
>>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
