Hi Andre,

(sorry for the delay in reply)

On 05/04/2019 16:31, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:36:09 +0000
> Julien Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Linux has this convention that the lower 0x1000 bytes of the IO space
>> should not be used. (cf PCIBIOS_MIN_IO).
>>
>> Just allocate those bytes to prevent future allocation assigning it to
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  arm/pci.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/pci.c b/arm/pci.c
>> index 83238ca..559e0cf 100644
>> --- a/arm/pci.c
>> +++ b/arm/pci.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ void pci__arm_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  
>>      /* Make PCI port allocation start at a properly aligned address */
>>      pci_get_io_space_block(align_pad);
>> +
>> +    /* Convention, don't allocate first 0x1000 bytes of PCI IO */
>> +    pci_get_io_space_block(0x1000);
> 
> Is this the same problem with mixing up I/O and MMIO space as in the other 
> patch?
> io_space means MMIO, right?
> 

Oh yes, you're right. Thanks for catching that (and in the other patch
as well).

However, fixing it unveiled a bug which apparently requires me to change
a bunch of things w.r.t. how we handle the configuration. At boot time,
Linux (without probe only) reassigns bars without disabling the device
response (it assumes that none of the devices it can configure are being
used/accessed).

This means that during the reassignment, bars from different or same
devices can temporarily alias/overlap each other during boot time. And
the current handling of PCI io/mmio region doesn't support that.

I'll rework this to make things a little bit more flexible.

Thanks,

-- 
Julien Thierry
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to