As I was cleaning up some of the GICv4 code to make way for GICv4.1 it
occured to me that we could drastically reduce the impact of the GICv4
doorbells on systems that are not oversubscribed (each vcpu "owns" a
physical CPU).

The technique borrows its logic from the way we disable WFE trapping
when a vcpu is the only process on the CPU run-queue. If this vcpu is
the target of VLPIs, it is then beneficial not to trap blocking WFIs
and to leave the vcpu waiting for interrupts in guest state.

All we need to do here is to track whether VLPIs are associated to a
vcpu (which is easily done by using a counter that we update on MAPI,
DISCARD and MOVI).

It has been *very lightly* tested on a D05, and behaved pretty well in
my limited test cases (I get almost no doorbell at all in the non
oversubscribed case, and the usual hailstorm as soon as there is
oversubscription). I'd welcome some testing on more current HW.

Marc Zyngier (2):
  KVM: vgic-v4: Track the number of VLPIs per vcpu
  KVM: arm64: Opportunistically turn off WFI trapping when using direct
    LPI injection

 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h   | 4 ++--
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 9 +++++++--
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h   | 2 ++
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                   | 4 ++--
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c        | 1 +
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c         | 3 +++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c          | 2 ++
 7 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to