If ipi_exec() fails because of timeout, we shouldn't increase
the number of ipi received.

Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingy...@huawei.com>
---
 arm/micro-bench.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
index 4612f41..ca022d9 100644
--- a/arm/micro-bench.c
+++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
@@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void ipi_exec(void)
        while (!ipi_received && tries--)
                cpu_relax();
 
-       ++received;
+       if (ipi_recieved)
+               ++received;
+
        assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received 
%d successfully\n", received);
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to