Hi Jingyi,

On 7/2/20 7:29 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:01:30AM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> For some test in micro-bench can be time consuming, we add a
>> micro-bench test parameter to allow each individual test to specify
>> its running times.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingy...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

Eric
>> ---
>>  arm/micro-bench.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
>> index aeb60a7..506d2f9 100644
>> --- a/arm/micro-bench.c
>> +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
>> @@ -223,17 +223,18 @@ struct exit_test {
>>      const char *name;
>>      bool (*prep)(void);
>>      void (*exec)(void);
>> +    u32 times;
>>      bool run;
>>  };
>>  
>>  static struct exit_test tests[] = {
>> -    {"hvc",                 NULL,           hvc_exec,               true},
>> -    {"mmio_read_user",      NULL,           mmio_read_user_exec,    true},
>> -    {"mmio_read_vgic",      NULL,           mmio_read_vgic_exec,    true},
>> -    {"eoi",                 NULL,           eoi_exec,               true},
>> -    {"ipi",                 ipi_prep,       ipi_exec,               true},
>> -    {"ipi_hw",              ipi_hw_prep,    ipi_exec,               true},
>> -    {"lpi",                 lpi_prep,       lpi_exec,               true},
>> +    {"hvc",                 NULL,           hvc_exec,               NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"mmio_read_user",      NULL,           mmio_read_user_exec,    NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"mmio_read_vgic",      NULL,           mmio_read_vgic_exec,    NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"eoi",                 NULL,           eoi_exec,               NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"ipi",                 ipi_prep,       ipi_exec,               NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"ipi_hw",              ipi_hw_prep,    ipi_exec,               NTIMES, 
>>         true},
>> +    {"lpi",                 lpi_prep,       lpi_exec,               NTIMES, 
>>         true},
> 
> Now that we no longer use 'NTIMES' in functions we don't really need the
> define at all. We can just put 65536 directly into the table here for
> each test that needs 65536 times.
> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct ns_time {
>> @@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ static void ticks_to_ns_time(uint64_t ticks, struct 
>> ns_time *ns_time)
>>  
>>  static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test)
>>  {
>> -    uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = NTIMES;
>> +    uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = 0;
>>      struct ns_time total_ns, avg_ns;
>>  
>>      if (test->prep) {
>> @@ -265,15 +266,17 @@ static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test)
>>      }
>>      isb();
>>      start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
>> -    while (ntimes--)
>> +    while (ntimes < test->times) {
>>              test->exec();
>> +            ntimes++;
>> +    }
>>      isb();
>>      end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
>>  
>>      total_ticks = end - start;
>>      ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);
>> -    avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / NTIMES;
>> -    avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / NTIMES;
>> +    avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / ntimes;
>> +    avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / ntimes;
>>  
>>      printf("%-30s%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 
>> "\n",
>>              test->name, total_ns.ns, total_ns.ns_frac, avg_ns.ns, 
>> avg_ns.ns_frac);
>> -- 
>> 2.19.1
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to