On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:54:04PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote: > Add an early parameter that allows users to opt into protected KVM mode > when using the nVHE hypervisor. In this mode, guest state will be kept > private from the host. This will primarily involve enabling stage-2 > address translation for the host, restricting DMA to host memory, and > filtering host SMCs. > > Capability ARM64_PROTECTED_KVM is set if the param is passed, CONFIG_KVM > is enabled and the kernel was not booted with VHE. > > Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbraz...@google.com> > --- > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 ++++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 +- > arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 8 +++++ > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++- > 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > index 526d65d8573a..06c89975c29c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt > @@ -2259,6 +2259,11 @@ > for all guests. > Default is 1 (enabled) if in 64-bit or 32-bit PAE mode. > > + kvm-arm.protected= > + [KVM,ARM] Allow spawning protected guests whose state > + is kept private from the host. Only valid for non-VHE. > + Default is 0 (disabled). > +
Sorry for being pedantic. Can we reword this to say valid for !CONFIG_ARM64_VHE ? I read this as valid only for non-VHE hardware, it may be just me, but if you agree please update so that it doesn't give remote idea that it is not valid on VHE enabled hardware. I was trying to run this on the hardware and was trying to understand the details on how to do that. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm