On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:05:27 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.eli...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > The ioport routines support a special way of registering FDT node
> > generator functions. There is no reason to have this separate from the
> > already existing way via the device header.
> >
> > Now that the only user of this special ioport variety has been
> > transferred, we can retire this code, to simplify ioport handling.
>
> One comment below, but otherwise very nice cleanup.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> > ---
> > include/kvm/ioport.h | 4 ----
> > ioport.c | 34 ----------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h
> > index d0213541..a61038e2 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h
> > @@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ struct ioport {
> > struct ioport_operations {
> > bool (*io_in)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> > void *data, int size);
> > bool (*io_out)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> > void *data, int size);
> > - void (*generate_fdt_node)(struct ioport *ioport, void *fdt,
> > - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
> > - u8 irq,
> > - enum irq_type));
> > };
> >
> > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq);
> > diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c
> > index 667e8386..b98836d3 100644
> > --- a/ioport.c
> > +++ b/ioport.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static struct ioport *ioport_get(struct rb_root *root,
> > u64 addr)
> > /* Called with ioport_lock held. */
> > static void ioport_unregister(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
> > {
> > - device__unregister(&data->dev_hdr);
> > ioport_remove(root, data);
> > free(data);
> > }
> > @@ -70,30 +69,6 @@ static void ioport_put(struct rb_root *root, struct
> > ioport *data)
> > mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
> > -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
> > - struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> > - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
> > - u8 irq,
> > - enum irq_type))
> > -{
> > - struct ioport *ioport = container_of(dev_hdr, struct ioport, dev_hdr);
> > - struct ioport_operations *ops = ioport->ops;
> > -
> > - if (ops->generate_fdt_node)
> > - ops->generate_fdt_node(ioport, fdt, generate_irq_prop);
> > -}
> > -#else
> > -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
> > - struct device_header *dev_hdr,
> > - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
> > - u8 irq,
> > - enum irq_type))
> > -{
> > - die("Unable to generate device tree nodes without libfdt\n");
> > -}
> > -#endif
> > -
> > int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations
> > *ops, int count, void *param)
> > {
> > struct ioport *entry;
> > @@ -107,10 +82,6 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct
> > ioport_operations *ops, i
> > .node = RB_INT_INIT(port, port + count),
> > .ops = ops,
> > .priv = param,
> > - .dev_hdr = (struct device_header) {
> > - .bus_type = DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
> > - .data = generate_ioport_fdt_node,
> > - },
>
> Since the dev_hdr field is not used anymore, maybe it could also be removed
> from
> struct ioport in include/kvm/ioport.h?
I could (seems to indeed still work without it), but this whole
structure will go away with a later patch, so I didn't bother so far.
That's why I am not sure it's useful to do this at this point then.
Cheers,
Andre
> > /*
> > * Start from 0 because ioport__unregister() doesn't decrement
> > * the reference count.
> > @@ -123,15 +94,10 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct
> > ioport_operations *ops, i
> > r = ioport_insert(&ioport_tree, entry);
> > if (r < 0)
> > goto out_free;
> > - r = device__register(&entry->dev_hdr);
> > - if (r < 0)
> > - goto out_remove;
> > mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
> >
> > return port;
> >
> > -out_remove:
> > - ioport_remove(&ioport_tree, entry);
> > out_free:
> > free(entry);
> > mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
