On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:57:05 +0000
Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've started to review this iteration and I've come across this error when
> trying
> to apply the patches:
>
> $ git am --reject
> patches/unify-ioport-and-mmio/v2/Unify-I-O-port-and-MMIO-trap-handling.patch
> Applying: ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch()
> Checking patch arm/ioport.c...
> Checking patch include/kvm/ioport.h...
> Checking patch ioport.c...
> Checking patch mips/kvm.c...
> Checking patch powerpc/ioport.c...
> Checking patch x86/ioport.c...
> Applied patch arm/ioport.c cleanly.
> Applied patch include/kvm/ioport.h cleanly.
> Applied patch ioport.c cleanly.
> Applied patch mips/kvm.c cleanly.
> Applied patch powerpc/ioport.c cleanly.
> Applied patch x86/ioport.c cleanly.
> Applying: hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function
> Checking patch hw/serial.c...
> Checking patch include/kvm/kvm.h...
> Applied patch hw/serial.c cleanly.
> Applied patch include/kvm/kvm.h cleanly.
> Applying: ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality
> Checking patch include/kvm/ioport.h...
> Checking patch ioport.c...
> Applied patch include/kvm/ioport.h cleanly.
> Applied patch ioport.c cleanly.
> Applying: mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation
> Checking patch include/kvm/kvm.h...
> Checking patch ioport.c...
> Checking patch mmio.c...
> Applied patch include/kvm/kvm.h cleanly.
> Applied patch ioport.c cleanly.
> Applied patch mmio.c cleanly.
> Applying: hw/i8042: Clean up data types
> Checking patch hw/i8042.c...
> Applied patch hw/i8042.c cleanly.
> Applying: hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler
> Checking patch hw/i8042.c...
> Applied patch hw/i8042.c cleanly.
> Applying: hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers
> Checking patch hw/i8042.c...
> error: while searching for:
> ioport__write8(data, value);
> }
>
> /*
> * Called when the OS has written to one of the keyboard's ports (0x60 or
> 0x64)
> */
> static bool kbd_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void
> *data, int size)
> {
> kbd_io(vcpu, port, data, size, false, NULL);
>
> return true;
> }
>
> static bool kbd_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> void
> *data, int size)
> {
> kbd_io(vcpu, port, data, size, true, NULL);
>
> return true;
> }
>
> static struct ioport_operations kbd_ops = {
> .io_in = kbd_in,
> .io_out = kbd_out,
> };
>
> int kbd__init(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> int r;
>
> kbd_reset();
> state.kvm = kvm;
> r = ioport__register(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG, &kbd_ops, 2, NULL);
> if (r < 0)
> return r;
> r = ioport__register(kvm, I8042_COMMAND_REG, &kbd_ops, 2, NULL);
> if (r < 0) {
> ioport__unregister(kvm, I8042_DATA_REG);
> return r;
> }
>
>
> error: patch failed: hw/i8042.c:325
> Checking patch include/kvm/i8042.h...
> Applying patch hw/i8042.c with 1 reject...
> Rejected hunk #1.
> Applied patch include/kvm/i8042.h cleanly.
> Patch failed at 0007 hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>
> where the patch file is from patchwork.kernel.org [1], created when clicking
> on
> the "series" button on the top right. I'm not sure what is causing the error,
> everything looks the same to me.
Ah, thanks for the heads up, and sorry for the pain! I can reproduce it,
and see what's going on: I made a last minute change, when creating the
changelog and going over the list of your comments again, and replaced
"false" with 0 in kbd_in() in patch 06/22, but only in the file, not in
the repo. So the follow-up patch - which removes this line again ;-) -
fails to apply.
> Regardless, I've applied the reject manually and everything looks ok.
Oh great, thanks! So I will wait with a resend until you are finished
with the review, and will then also upload to our gitlab.
Apologies for the inconvenience!
Cheers,
Andre
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/kvm/patch/[email protected]/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> On 2/25/21 12:58 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Compared to v1 this has a few fixes, as suggested by Alex.
> > There is a new patch 20/22, which cleans up the ARM memory map
> > definition and adds some chart to make it more obvious what is going on.
> > For a changelog, see below.
> >
> > ==============
> >
> > At the moment we use two separate code paths to handle exits for
> > KVM_EXIT_IO (ioport.c) and KVM_EXIT_MMIO (mmio.c), even though they
> > are semantically very similar. Because the trap handler callback routine
> > is different, devices need to decide on one conduit or need to provide
> > different handler functions for both of them.
> >
> > This is not only unnecessary code duplication, but makes switching
> > devices from I/O port to MMIO a tedious task, even though there is no
> > real difference between the two, especially on ARM and PowerPC.
> >
> > For ARM we aim at providing a flexible memory layout, and also have
> > trouble with the UART and RTC device overlapping with the PCI I/O area,
> > so it seems indicated to tackle this once and for all.
> >
> > The first three patches do some cleanup, to simplify things later.
> >
> > Patch 04/22 lays the groundwork, by extending mmio.c to be able to also
> > register I/O port trap handlers, using the same callback prototype as
> > we use for MMIO.
> >
> > The next 14 patches then convert devices that use the I/O port
> > interface over to the new joint interface. This requires to rework
> > the trap handler routine to adhere to the same prototype as the existing
> > MMIO handlers. For most devices this is done in two steps: a first to
> > introduce the reworked handler routine, and a second to switch to the new
> > joint registration routine. For some devices the first step is trivial,
> > so it's done in one patch.
> >
> > Patch 19/22 then retires the old I/O port interface, by removing ioport.c
> > and friends.
> > Patch 20/22 uses the opportunity to clean up the memory map description,
> > also declares a new region (from 16MB on), where the final two patches
> > switch the UART and the RTC device to. They are now registered
> > on the MMIO "bus", when running on ARM or arm64. This moves them away
> > from the first 64KB, so they are not in the PCI I/O area anymore.
> >
> > Please have a look and comment!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Andre
> >
> > Changelog v1 .. v2:
> > - rework memory map definition
> > - add explicit debug output for debug I/O port
> > - add explicit check for MMIO coalescing on I/O ports
> > - drop usage of ioport__{read,write}8() from serial
> > - drop explicit I/O port cleanup routine (to mimic MMIO operation)
> > - add comment for IOTRAP_BUS_MASK
> > - minor cleanups / formatting changes
> >
> > Andre Przywara (22):
> > ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch()
> > hw/serial: Use device abstraction for FDT generator function
> > ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality
> > mmio: Extend handling to include ioport emulation
> > hw/i8042: Clean up data types
> > hw/i8042: Refactor trap handler
> > hw/i8042: Switch to new trap handlers
> > x86/ioport: Refactor trap handlers
> > x86/ioport: Switch to new trap handlers
> > hw/rtc: Refactor trap handlers
> > hw/rtc: Switch to new trap handler
> > hw/vesa: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler
> > hw/serial: Refactor trap handler
> > hw/serial: Switch to new trap handlers
> > vfio: Refactor ioport trap handler
> > vfio: Switch to new ioport trap handlers
> > virtio: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler
> > pci: Switch trap handling to use MMIO handler
> > Remove ioport specific routines
> > arm: Reorganise and document memory map
> > hw/serial: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses
> > hw/rtc: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses
> >
> > Makefile | 1 -
> > arm/include/arm-common/kvm-arch.h | 47 ++++--
> > arm/ioport.c | 5 -
> > hw/i8042.c | 94 +++++-------
> > hw/rtc.c | 91 ++++++------
> > hw/serial.c | 160 ++++++++++++--------
> > hw/vesa.c | 19 +--
> > include/kvm/i8042.h | 1 -
> > include/kvm/ioport.h | 32 ----
> > include/kvm/kvm.h | 49 ++++++-
> > ioport.c | 235 ------------------------------
> > mips/kvm.c | 5 -
> > mmio.c | 65 +++++++--
> > pci.c | 82 +++--------
> > powerpc/ioport.c | 6 -
> > vfio/core.c | 50 ++++---
> > virtio/pci.c | 46 ++----
> > x86/ioport.c | 107 +++++++-------
> > 18 files changed, 433 insertions(+), 662 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 ioport.c
> >
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
