On Sunday 06 Jun 2021 at 11:31:20 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2021-06-02 10:43, Quentin Perret wrote: > > We currently maintain two separate memory pools for the host stage-2, > > one for pages used in the page-table when mapping memory regions, and > > the other to map MMIO regions. The former is large enough to map all of > > memory with page granularity and the latter can cover an arbitrary > > portion of IPA space, but allows to 'recycle' pages. > > > > However, this split makes accounting difficult to manage as pages at > > intermediate levels of the page-table may be used to map both memory and > > MMIO regions. Simplify the scheme by merging both pools into one. This > > means we can now hit the -ENOMEM case in the memory abort path, but > > we're still guaranteed forward-progress in the worst case by unmapping > > MMIO regions. On the plus side this also means we can usually map a lot > > more MMIO space at once if memory ranges happen to be mapped with block > > mappings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qper...@google.com> > > This patch fails to apply on top of -rc4. Did you use some more exotic > base or, as I suspect, a development tree? > > Please check and respin the series if necessary.
I used kvmarm/next, but clearly an out-of-date one. I'll respin -- sorry about that. Thanks, Quentin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm