On 8/10/21 7:01 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:36:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
>> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
>> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-perf-us...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khand...@arm.com>
>> ---
>> This applies on v5.14-rc5
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 6 +++---
>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Please can you split this with the KVM parts in their own patch?
Sure, will do.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
