Hi Ricardo,
On 9/28/21 8:47 PM, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Add the new vgic_check_iorange helper that checks that an iorange is
> sane: the start address and size have valid alignments, the range is
> within the addressable PA range, start+size doesn't overflow, and the
> start wasn't already defined.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricar...@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index 7740995de982..f714aded67b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,28 @@ int vgic_check_ioaddr(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int vgic_check_iorange(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> + phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment,
> + phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vgic_check_ioaddr(kvm, ioaddr, addr, alignment);
nit: not related to this patch but I am just wondering why we are
passing phys_addr_t *ioaddr downto vgic_check_ioaddr and thus to
vgic_check_iorange()? This must be a leftover of some old code?
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, alignment))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (addr + size < addr)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (addr + size > kvm_phys_size(kvm))
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vgic_check_type(struct kvm *kvm, int type_needed)
> {
> if (kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model != type_needed)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 14a9218641f5..c4df4dcef31f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ void vgic_irq_handle_resampling(struct vgic_irq *irq,
> int vgic_check_ioaddr(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment);
>
> +int vgic_check_iorange(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t *ioaddr,
> + phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t alignment,
> + phys_addr_t size);
> +
> void vgic_v2_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void vgic_v2_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int
> lr);
> void vgic_v2_clear_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr);
Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Eric
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
