index_to_param() already checks that we use 64bit accesses for all
registers accessed from userspace.
However, we have extra checks in other places, which is pretty
confusing. Get rid on these checks.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 0fbdb21a3600..5dbe0f4b8167 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2871,9 +2871,6 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const
struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) == KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX)
return demux_c15_get(reg->id, uaddr);
- if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(__u64))
- return -ENOENT;
-
err = get_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
if (err != -ENOENT)
return err;
@@ -2906,9 +2903,6 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const
struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if ((reg->id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) == KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX)
return demux_c15_set(reg->id, uaddr);
- if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) != sizeof(__u64))
- return -ENOENT;
-
err = set_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
if (err != -ENOENT)
return err;
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
