On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 07:10:09 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsi...@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is v4 of the series adding support for nVHE hypervisor stacktraces;
> and is based on arm64 for-next/stacktrace.
> 
> Thanks all for your feedback on previous revisions. Mark Brown, I
> appreciate your Reviewed-by on the v3, I have dropped the tags in this
> new verision since I think the series has changed quite a bit.
> 
> The previous versions were posted at:
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607165105.639716-1-kaleshsi...@google.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220502191222.4192768-1-kaleshsi...@google.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427184716.1949239-1-kaleshsi...@google.com/
> 
> The main updates in this version are to address concerens from Marc on the
> memory usage and reusing the common code by refactoring into a shared header.

Overall, the series looks better. I've pointed out a few things that
need changing, but my overall gripe is around the abuse the
stacktrace/nvhe.h as a dumping ground. A lot of the code there could
be pushed to handle_exit.c (or some other compilation unit).

I've pushed an example of a 10 minutes refactor in my tree
(kvm-arm64/nvhe-stacktrace), and I'm sure these are the lowest hanging
fruits.

Thanks,

        M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to