On Mon, Sep 19, 2022, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:09:17 +0000, Ricardo Koller wrote: > > This series adds a new aarch64 selftest for testing stage 2 fault handling > > for > > various combinations of guest accesses (e.g., write, S1PTW), backing sources > > (e.g., anon), and types of faults (e.g., read on hugetlbfs with a hole, > > write > > on a readonly memslot). Each test tries a different combination and then > > checks > > that the access results in the right behavior (e.g., uffd faults with the > > right > > address and write/read flag). Some interesting combinations are: > > > > [...] > > Given how long this has been around, I've picked this series up, applying > Oliver's fixes in the process.
Any chance this can be undone? A big reason why this is at v6 is because of the common API changes, and due to KVM Forum I've effectively had three working days since this was posted, and others have probably had even less, i.e. lack of reviews on v6 isn't because no one cares. It's not the end of the world if we have to fix things up on top, but we'd avoid a decent amount of churn if we can instead unwind and do a v7. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
