Gavin,
Side note: please make sure you always Cc all the KVM/arm64 reviewers
when sending patches (now added).
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 07:54:47 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The ITS collection is guranteed to be !NULL when update_affinity_collection()
> is called. So we needn't check ITE's collection with NULL because the
> check has been included to the later one.
It took me a while to understand what you meant by this: the 'coll'
parameter to update_affinity_collection() is never NULL, so comparing
it with 'ite->collection' is enough to cover both the NULL case and
the "another collection" case.
If you agree with this, I can directly fix the commit message when
applying the patch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
