On 13/12/22 01:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Fix a == vs. = typo in kvm_get_cpu_address_width() that results in @pa_bits being left unset if the CPU doesn't support enumerating its MAX_PHY_ADDR. Flagged by clang's unusued-value warning.lib/x86_64/processor.c:1034:51: warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value] *pa_bits == kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32; Fixes: 3bd396353d18 ("KVM: selftests: Add X86_FEATURE_PAE and use it calc "fallback" MAXPHYADDR") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c index c4d368d56cfe..acfa1d01e7df 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ bool is_amd_cpu(void) void kvm_get_cpu_address_width(unsigned int *pa_bits, unsigned int *va_bits) { if (!kvm_cpu_has_p(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR)) { - *pa_bits == kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32; + *pa_bits = kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;
:) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
