PMUv3p5 uses 64-bit counters irrespective of whether the PMU is configured
for overflowing at 32 or 64-bits. The consequence is that tests that check
the counter values after overflowing should not assume that values will be
wrapped around 32-bits: they overflow into the other half of the 64-bit
counters on PMUv3p5.

Fix tests by correctly checking overflowing-counters against the expected
64-bit value.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricar...@google.com>
---
 arm/pmu.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index cd47b14..1b55e20 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -54,10 +54,13 @@
 #define EXT_COMMON_EVENTS_LOW  0x4000
 #define EXT_COMMON_EVENTS_HIGH 0x403F
 
-#define ALL_SET                        0xFFFFFFFF
-#define ALL_CLEAR              0x0
-#define PRE_OVERFLOW           0xFFFFFFF0
-#define PRE_OVERFLOW2          0xFFFFFFDC
+#define ALL_SET                        0x00000000FFFFFFFFULL
+#define ALL_SET_64             0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL
+#define ALL_CLEAR              0x0000000000000000ULL
+#define PRE_OVERFLOW           0x00000000FFFFFFF0ULL
+#define PRE_OVERFLOW2          0x00000000FFFFFFDCULL
+
+#define ALL_SET_AT(_64b)       (_64b ? ALL_SET_64 : ALL_SET)
 
 #define PMU_PPI                        23
 
@@ -538,6 +541,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(void)
 static void test_sw_incr(void)
 {
        uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, SW_INCR};
+       uint64_t cntr0;
        int i;
 
        if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
@@ -572,9 +576,11 @@ static void test_sw_incr(void)
                write_sysreg(0x3, pmswinc_el0);
 
        isb();
-       report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0)  == 84, "counter #1 after + 100 
SW_INCR");
-       report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1)  == 100,
-               "counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR");
+       cntr0 = (pmu.version < ID_DFR0_PMU_V3_8_5) ?
+               (uint32_t)PRE_OVERFLOW + 100 :
+               (uint64_t)PRE_OVERFLOW + 100;
+       report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0, "counter #0 after + 100 
SW_INCR");
+       report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 100, "counter #1 after + 100 
SW_INCR");
        report_info("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld",
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
        report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
@@ -584,6 +590,7 @@ static void test_sw_incr(void)
 static void test_chained_counters(void)
 {
        uint32_t events[] = {CPU_CYCLES, CHAIN};
+       uint64_t all_set = ALL_SET_AT(pmu.version >= ID_DFR0_PMU_V3_8_5);
 
        if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
                return;
@@ -614,17 +621,19 @@ static void test_chained_counters(void)
        report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1, "overflow recorded for chained 
incr #2");
 
        write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW);
-       write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET);
+       write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, all_set);
 
        precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
        report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
-       report(!read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1), "CHAIN counter #1 wrapped");
+       report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 0, "CHAIN counter #1 wrapped");
+
        report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3, "overflow on even and odd 
counters");
 }
 
 static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
 {
        uint32_t events[] = {SW_INCR, CHAIN};
+       uint64_t cntr0, cntr1;
        int i;
 
        if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
@@ -665,10 +674,14 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
                write_sysreg(0x1, pmswinc_el0);
 
        isb();
+       cntr0 = (pmu.version < ID_DFR0_PMU_V3_8_5) ?
+               (uint32_t)PRE_OVERFLOW + 100 :
+               (uint64_t)PRE_OVERFLOW + 100;
+       cntr1 = (pmu.version < ID_DFR0_PMU_V3_8_5) ? 0 : ALL_SET + 1;
        report((read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3) &&
-               (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 0) &&
-               (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == 84),
-               "expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
+              (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0) &&
+              (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == cntr1),
+              "expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
        report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
 }
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to