On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:37:48 +0000, "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now that the SRCU Kconfig option is unconditionally selected, there is > no longer any point in selecting it. Therefore, remove the "select SRCU" > Kconfig statements. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> > Cc: James Morse <[email protected]> > Cc: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]> > Cc: Oliver Upton <[email protected]> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > index 05da3c8f7e88f..312f0e9869111 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ menuconfig KVM > select KVM_MMIO > select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > select KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK > - select SRCU > select KVM_VFIO > select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD > select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
