Thank you all for the help! :) The code runs, and it's giving results in the testing stage.
Baris On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Anton Akhmerov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Baris, > > Sounds like an interesting problem! I suspect that the performance > could be better if you calculate the Green's function or the > scattering matrix of the system at different energies once, and couple > to the spin in a separate stage. This is probably more manual work > though. > > Keep in touch about how it goes. > > Best, > Anton > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Baris Pekerten <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thank you very much. :) I'll try this tomorrow and post the results.. > It's > > definitely neater than mymod = __import__('make_sys_file') and > > getattrib(mymod, relevant_make_sys_func) with make_sys_file.py containing > > 100 different make_sys functions. > > > > The application is about an interaction with a big external spin of > value J, > > and the number of lattices is essentially 2J+1. I want to be able to see > the > > effect of J vs. transmission etc. > > > > Baris > > > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joseph Weston < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Also, I've got to ask: why do you want to do this? I'm struggling to > >> think of an application where you would have ~100 separate channels like > >> that that are all separately measureable. This is probably due to a lack > >> of imagination on my part ;) > >> > >> Joe > > > > >
