<fcntl snipped> >>I therefore do not consider it to be "dummy". >> >>L4VFS is meant to be extended on a use-case basis, it has grown over the >>last 1 1/2 years as other projects utilized it. Maybe you have to >>extend it a little bit. We gladly accept patches (hint, hint). > > ;)... ok i've understood the hint. > but the dummy i've talked about was the implementation of > l4vfs_*_fcntl_component(...). > that is the implementation of the dielibc...
This has *nothing* to do with the dietlibc! > bue when it calls the > server side function it's not implemented. Your are quite unprecise with your statements. Which fcntl do you mean? Are you talking about l4vfs/lib/server/fcntl.c? This is the weak implementation of the server lib. Every server which implements fcntl() functionality shall provide its own impl. overriding this weak dummy impl. I think you now know were to start coding ... > my question was if in one of those projects someone implemented it I dont know of any such thing. Greets, Martin _______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers
