On Tue Aug 06, 2013 at 23:47:58 +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote: > Adam Lackorzynski writes: > [...] > >> Still, L4::Scheduler::info says there's as many CPUs as the maximum number > >> configured into Fiasco (not the number offered by QEMU). I'm just not sure > >> if > >> this should be considered a bug or a feature. > > > Fiasco does not know what the maximum number of CPUs on that particular > > machine will ever be, so it just says what it can support. Also, one has > > to wait a bit until all CPUs are up because Fiasco does not wait to > > start sigma0+moe until all CPUs are up (e.g. see migrate example). > > Sorry, I just realized that what I misunderstood is the output of the migrate > example, not the description of L4::Scheduler::info: > > Maybe changing it to "Supports up to %ld CPUs" would be clearer, or instead > (or > in addition) calculating the number of detected/online CPUs.
True, I reworded it. Adam -- Adam [email protected] Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/ _______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers
