On 15 Feb 2014, at 13:30 , Blaine Garst <[email protected]> wrote: >> Overall, I think that current kernels do what's architecturally possible >> regarding IPC. > > Sorry, but I disagree, because the software architecture is wrong. > > Change the architecture and more speed is possible.
Good luck with that! L4 IPC has been unbeaten for 20 years. On 15 Feb 2014, at 16:46 , Daniel Potts <[email protected]> wrote: > You do realize some implementations of L4 IPC are sub 50 cycles with full > address space switch?? A lot has happened since 1992!! You've got a lot of > reading (papers and code) to do. A good starting point would be Elphinstone & Heiser, From L3 to seL4 -- What Have We Learnt in 20 Years of L4 Microkernels?, SOSP 2013 Gernot
_______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers
