On Mon Aug 10, 2015 at 06:37:27 +0000, shabnam wrote: > Adam Lackorzynski <adam <at> os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: > > > > > On Sat Aug 08, 2015 at 07:53:17 +0000, Shabnam Engineer wrote: > > > Hi thanks for your answersI want to implement Fiasco.OC on a board and > test some RTOS beside other non > > realtime OS .. at first I want to be sure that if I need a driver for > our special tests and the Fiasco.OC > > does not support that, Could I choose it from linux drivers and port it > to Fiasco.OC microkernel?does > > someone do this work?thanks for your considering my > question.regards, shabnam > > > > I'm not sure I understand. Which type of driver do you think you need? > > Which type of board do you have? > > > > Adam > > Hello Adam > Our test does not exactly specify till now, but I think we need a net > driver and some other necessary drivers. We want to use arm-based board > like raspberry Pi or exynos or lpc3250. > We want to be sure that we will not face the problem at the middle of our > works if we choose Fiasco.OC.
In this case L4Linux is the faster approach to have drivers. But still, on ARM, it's generally not a plug'n'play experience. Adam -- Adam a...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/ _______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list l4-hackers@os.inf.tu-dresden.de http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers
