I don't want to argue with you, now. I read the ml and know there have
already been long discussions. For me it looked like both the pros and
the cons always found an answer, I don't want to begin that again, as I
think it will be more or less the same conversation. I could say that it
was planned to wrap the driver tasks into hurd tasks, I could say in my
idea it would be possible to run multiple OS at the same time, as all
resource management is done through servers that are only once in a the
system.
I absolutely agree with you that drivers are no aliens and must to be
handled in a ordinary way, actually 1-3 of my argumentation don't really
affect my mind, the fourth was what decided me to rethink.
Actually, I think so. who a) has been part of the first argumentation
about the posix level drivers and b) is allowed to should come to a
decision (I guess the only thing that has to be decided is wether 4 is
worth it.).
--
-ness-
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
