At Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:34:09 +0200, Bernhard Kauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now to copy(): I know no functional argument to introduce a copy() into > L4.sec. The only argument is performance. Because mapping (or copy) a > return endpoint with every RPC will be too expensive,
Ask Espen about "map-once" mappings to learn how to allow to optimize reply capabilities. > server protocols will be session based. To establish a new session > with a server the server has to be called anyway, which nullifies > the advantage of copy(). You won't actually call this policy neutral, will you? Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
