On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > We haven't thought out any of them. > > I think that is unreasonably harsh. Some of the people on this list have > extensive experiences with other OS's, and everyone has thought about > the Hurd in some degree.
My wording wasn't good, sorry. What I meant is that we haven't thought out any view as well as you have thought out your view. This of course doesn't mean we didn't think about anything, just that we're more likely to miss things. > We should reject useful input from anyone. Ehm, I guess you mean "shouldn't". ;-) Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
