On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:35 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I meant: in a non-persistent system. The reason for my question is that > Jonathan concluded that persistence is mostly "a matter of taste". > Passive translators seem to be a counter-example.
I said this, but I don't think this is really my conclusion. Having worked with it, I feel pretty strongly that persistence is a good thing. My problem is that this feeling comes from the interactions of a lot of complex issues that I have not yet been able to clearly tease apart. Until I am able to do that, I cannot give a clear and unambiguous rationale for persistence. In the absence of that rationale... shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
