On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 20:54 +0100, ness wrote: > I actually wanted to express: every visible resource revokation on an > application A that might be caused by an application B where B isn't > allowed to talk to A seems to be covert channel. > > > [...]
This is correct. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
