On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 18:03 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > This is. But what about foo.gz? There are numerous other examples where it > would be useful to have different facets which have (at least partly) > overlapping operations, with different implementations (so just using any of > them is not an option)
Yes. But even here you don't need to bind a name unless you need to interact with an application that requires a path-based interface. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
