At Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:42:41 +0200,
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> In the upcoming L4 versions, and in Coyotos, destruction of the
> receiver of a reply capability does not cause any action to be
> triggered: Pending RPCs are not aborted.  This is because there is an
> extra level of indirection between the reply capability and the thread
> (first class receive buffer).

Clarification: FCRB here is meant as a synonymous for thread (one is
an L4 term, the other a Coyotos term).  The indirection is of course
the endpoint.

Thanks,
Marcus



_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd

Reply via email to