Hi, On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:43:19PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> But even if the system is several times slower than GNU/Linux it is > not necessarily a problem. If it offers superior features I would go > for it. Anyway, most slowdown is not caused by the kernel and system > design but by bloated GUIs. That's precisely my own view on these matters. (And the reason why I still consider any ongoing development on Hurd/Mach not only absolutely worthwhile, but actually the main priority, in spite of it's know performance problems...) Nice to see others expressing similar opinions -- especially as some persons here claim that the prospect of achieving Linux-like performance is an absolute must for further development to be justified, as most people -- they claim -- won't accept anything slower, regardless of additional features. -antrik- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
