Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 28/04/2006 hora 00:59: > I don't see a problem with providing users a process tree and the > option attempt to kill parts of the tree, including leaf-nodes.
When something goes wrong in the browser, how does the global process tree dialog fires up? In KDE or Windows XP, the user has to have prior knwoledge on how to do this (respectively Ctrl+Esc and Ctrl+Alt+Del, IIRC). > A similar issue arises with authorising access to files via the > powerbox: A browser could advise the user that access to a file is for > a certain plugin only. I'm not sure if the powerbox shoudl allow such potentially malicious behaviour: if the resource is for a plugin, shouldn't the powerbox be able to tell the user that the plugin indeed will be the recipient of the capability? If the browser will be the recipient, the powerbox should at least warn the user that any reason given by the browser about the need for the capability carries no guarantee. Trustfully, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
