Scribit Marco Gerards dies 02/05/2006 hora 09:46: > > To all members of the list: please reply to the list. In the > > previous two weeks, I received a personal copy of exactly hundred > > emails. > This is the normal way of posting on any mailinglist.
Don't generalize too fast. This is definitely not the normal way of posting on most mailing lists I'm subscribed to, and also considered an annoyance on most of them. Which has lead me to perceive it as such. It can be the rule here, which I shall respect if it is and stop complaining, but this definitely not is a rule everywhere. > Fix your mailclient instead of telling everyone how to work. My mail client has not to be fixed. It obeys all the standards headers defined for the electronic mail by the IETF, in the STD and RFC tracks. Additionaly, my mail client is not involved in distributing incoming mail. When I receive mail twice, one I'm the direct recipient without anything inbetween and one being transmitted by a mailing list, it would be a bug in my MTA not to deliver the first in my personal incoming mail box and the second in my hurd-l4 incoming mail box. As for the other mail on this very subject, just prove me wrong if you think I am, I will sincerely listen to your arguments if they are consistent. So far, no sound technical mean was proposed to me to prevent the annoyance of receiving mails twice, so I tried a social mean. Maybe this is an argument in favour of enforcing rules technically. ;-) Simply, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
