On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 20:29 +0200, Espen Skoglund wrote: > o Depending on your definition of security, the presence of global > names does not necessarily mean that the system is unsecure.
Yes. If you are prepared to redefine security to exclude considerations of denial of service, fault isolation, or information flow isolation, this is certainly reasonable. But the credibility of such a definition would have to be severely challenged. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
