At Tue, 16 May 2006 00:05:24 +0200, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [1 <multipart/signed (7bit)>] > [1.1 <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>] > Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 15/05/2006 hora 22:02: > > > But that's a very personal judgment, with no obvious link with GNU > > > philosophy. You're free, then, to make no effort to help actively to > > > support computer competition, but it's no reason for the Hurd to > > > avoid supporting it. > > I agree. That would not be a good reason. > > If we agree on that, I have no problem anymore on the subject. > > Could you also tell me what you think about the link between > virtualization and constructor, in the light of my proposal on this > issue? Do you still think, if constructor is implemented the way I > describe it, that they are incompatible (and I agree with you that > virutalization is indeed a very important feature, for many reasons)?
As far as I understood your proposal, the disclose flag needed to be set voluntarily by the creator of the constructor. That does not satisfy my concerns. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
