On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > If you remove the "non-trivial", I agree. :-) I think this can easily be > implemented using trivial confinement as well, though. Or am I missing > something?
No, I think you got it right. I just didn't realise how little trust there has to be between the parties for non-trivial confinement to be needed. I've also realised that I don't really understand who pays for the resources in the different versions of confinement. I guess it's time for some more reading. Sam _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
