Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 18/05/2006 hora 15:36: > > The hospital case is very special. > The hospital case can be summarized like this: "The law requires the > implementor to implement DRM. How do you do it?"
I'm not sure that the need of the hospital use case is indeed DRM. I can't speak for Shap, but this kind of answer is dismissal for me because it's not that obvious that there is a need for DRM, and you use the DRM argument to reject the case. Of course, if you're right that the core need here is in fact DRM, and DRM is to be banned from the Hurd, so you're perfectly right to reject the case. But there is a hole in the logical chain that should lead to your answer (at least for me). Rhetorically, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
