-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 16:45 +0200, Tom Bachmann wrote: >>> I do not believe so. The transparency of the bank is completely >>> orthogonal to whether the bank can be authenticated as a particular type >>> of bank. >>> >> Yes, of course. But if I have access to the programs memory, I can patch >> the test if(opaque_bank(my_bank)) go_on();else abort(); to if(true) ... > > As I understand matters, the current proposal is for *read* access, not > *write* access... >
I am not sure if we can speak about something like a "current proposal" (at least I can't see where it has been stated). But yes, this is only true for write access, of course. - -- - -ness- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEcdVfvD/ijq9JWhsRAiYeAJ49yJnI+Y2yIdN6iTnvye7M6bbPcQCfaPHA 0QWnWhkM+2uurqP7nXOXybM= =XwgF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
