At Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:28:12 -0400, "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:30 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > At Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:21:21 -0400, > > "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:20 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:23:53PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > > > > Indeed. And while we are about it: where do you propose to store keys > > > > > that are used for group signatures? > > > > > > > > In some place that cannot be destroyed by any of the members of the > > > > group, but > > > > only by the group administrators. That is, in a special user account > > > > created > > > > specially for that group. > > > > > > Ah. So you propose that the computational "right of assembly" should be > > > present only with the consent of the system administrator? > > > > Can you pelase define what you mean by "computational 'right of > > assembly'"? The term is entirely void of meaning to me. > > If the group keys should be stored in a specially created account, then > the system administrator's permission is required in order to form a > private group. This seems contrary to freedom.
I think you did not answer my question. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
