On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:33 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 5/29/06, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In general, some capabilities typically given by the constructor need > > only to be read-only, for example the TCB ones, like to the > > meta-constructor and the constructor. Though in some virtualization > > cases, they also should be unreadable. (Jonathan, I think I'm starting > > to understand why you think that disclosure should not be the default) > > I don't see why there has to be always a capability that is provided > by the constructor.
As I stated in a previous message, there *aren't* any such magic capabilities provided by the constructor. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
