Hello all, My PhD project is getting in trouble, in part due to the large amount of brain capacity I am spending on the Hurd lately. Since I want to finish my PhD properly, I decided to stop working on the Hurd until it is finished. That will take at least a year.
I'm sorry that I can't continue to contribute at the moment. I am very enthousiastic about the project, and am confident that you can make it a success without me. In case of any questions where you would like my opinion, please feel free to e-mail me privately (or via Cc). Don't expect that I know what's going on though; I will unsubscribe from all Hurd mailinglists. In particular, I really would still like to hear an answer from Jonathan to my e-mail about the ethics of TC. Specifically: I suppose you disagree with my analysis, I am interested to know on which points. If not, do you then agree with the conclusion that implementing TC at this moment would be unethical? (Note that IMO it is not unethical to disagree and implement TC, only to agree but still implement TC anyway.) For reference, the e-mail I am talking about: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2006-06/msg00058.html Finally, a note to Thomas: I am still listed as a list-owner for [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I no longer know the password, so I cannot remove myself from it (nor moderate, as you may have noticed). Could you please remove me from the list of list-owners? Thanks all, and good luck, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
