-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gustavo Romero wrote: > Hi, > > There seems to be several L4 successors with security in mind.
Yes. > Is there > a comparison between them in any place? I'm not aware of any. > Coyotos web said there is some > similarities with l4.sec. Again... is there any place with a comparison? > Can somebody help see the light? :) > You could read what is available of information (sadly, the L4 successors aren't developed in such an open fashion like coyotos): http://www.coyotos.org/docs/ukernel/spec.html http://l4hq.org/docs/manuals/l4_sec_20051019.pdf and http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/papers_ps/kauer-diplom.pdf http://i30www.ira.uka.de/teaching/coursedocuments/105/l4ng-apr28.pdf > This may be not the right list to make these questions but... I think > some of you had done this comparison between kernels to be able to > choose one of them as a basis for the hurd. > First of all, you should know that no kernel has been chosen yet. The reasons for concentrating most on coyotos are more pragmatically, AIUI: it is hoped coyotos will be usable sooner, coyotos is developed more openly, and jonathan has a lot of experiance wrt capability systems he offered to share. - -- - -ness- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFErp+SvD/ijq9JWhsRAoi7AJ4pOqUvyjeVmsBABoRop+RzLt+s+ACeOsQE sPMuiTCX37wRy/6vOr4/q/8= =0wQ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
