There is no license that handles what you want, because it is not the paper of the license handle that. It is a question of trade-mark.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:02:19 -0400 "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 22:41 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > > > > The one thing we will require (which is why there is a question about > > > GFDL) is that any modification of the document must not be described > > > as Coyotos. > > > > This is actually one of the things GFDL tries to ensure... Do you think > > the provisions may not be strong enough? > > GFDL has provisions to insist that certain sections not be removed or > changed. I can't figure out anything in it that lets me say "if you > change this section, then you must globally replace the name 'Coyotos' > with something else". Merely updating a change history is not enough. > > Also, the damned thing is horribly complex. > > When the time comes to change the copyright, I'll ask the relevant > people at FSF for advice. At the moment, this is not a priority and I > don't want to divert my attention right now. > > Thanks, though! > > > shap > > > > _______________________________________________ > L4-hurd mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
