Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 01/09/2006 hora 00:36: > > DRM is an unfortunate perversion of this technical capability. > My current opinion is that the analysis indicates that it is not a > perversion of the technology, but that the perversion is inherent in > the technology, because of the inherent nature of information as > non-proprietarizable. > > Interestingly enough, the same argument shows that the technology > fundamentally doesn't work in the long run. However, even if it > doesn't work in principle, its attempted implementation can > potentially do a lot of harm in the meantime.
I must admit I'm a bit confused here: what argument shows that the technology fundamentally doesn't work in the long run? And what do you mean exactly by this? Curiously, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
