Arnuld: Daniel's reply did not go to the list. Did he intend that it should be private?
[I assume Daniel writes:] > > GNU has it's own micro-kernel it's called GNU Mach, this is the official > > micro-kernel of the Hurd. Maybe you should work on that?[1] I don't > > think there are too many people who are willing to work on a completely > > new micro-kernel, and you'd be hard pressed to write a decent one by > > yourself. > > IIRC, GNU Mach is derived from CMU Mach. so we have not built our own > from scratch according to our own design principles. > > > [1] http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Mach/GNUMachRevivalProject > > i will check it before i post anything further. There is a long list of things this group does not completely agree about: DRM, GPLv3, design of a new operating system. One thing that the group *does* agree about -- and most notably, the architects of the original Hurd system agree about this -- is that the Mach kernel has failed us. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
