Scribit Marcus Brinkmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 20:26: > The principle is user's control over their resources, or short "user > freedom".
Well, with respect to classical law, in your scenario the user has less freedom and control over it's own resources, because you give him the /usus/, the right to use it, but you refuse him the right to give exclusive /usus/ to someone else. That's a basic freedom in real life, and it's pretty useful in some very interesting schemes in OS implementation. > In the total dominance case, the relationship of control over the > resources remains the same before and after the operation. In the > peer case, it is altered, that's a threat scenario for me. It's not really altered, because the originating peer keeps the /abusus/, which gives him the ability to get back to the exact state of control it was before. Freely, Pierre -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
