Scribit Tom Bachmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 19:26: > I don't think cpu time pools are to be passed to servers. Although > this would increase accounting, it would as well horrify the > complexity of the server and require special kernel support, as has > been discussed on the list (or on coyotos-dev?).
Won't Coyotos has scheduler activations, or the primitives needed to implement them? I thought they would make such designs relatively easy to implement? (but I confess I did not dig the issue of scheduler activations deeply, and I barely grasp the concept...) Curiously, Pierre -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
