>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Rense.com >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Fixed - The Stealing Of >Another Election >11-3-4 > >Democratic Underground.com > >EarlG (xxx posts) Wed Nov-03-04 02:57 AM > >Kerry winning Exit Polls - FRAUD LOOKS PROBABLE > >SoCalDem has done a statistical analysis... > >...on several swing states, and EVERY STATE that has EVoting but no >paper trails has an unexplained advantage for Bush of around +5% >when comparing exit polls to actual results. > >In EVERY STATE that has paper audit trails on their EVoting, the >exit poll results match the actual results reported within the >margin of error. > >So, we have MATCHING RESULTS for exit polls vs. voting with audits > >vs. > >A 5% unexplained advantage for Bush without audits. > >Maybe Dubayah believes God will see him through this, but it's going >to take more than blind faith to pull the wool over the data and the >facts. > >http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... >Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 12:42 AM by SoCalDemocrat >EDIT: > >Analysis of the polling data vs actual data and voting systems >supports the hypothesis that evoting may be to blame in the >discrepancies. Nevada has evoting but with verified receipts. In >that state the Exit Polling matches the actual results within .1% >accuracy. However for other swing states Bush has unexplainable >leads. > >I'm still compiling data. Please help me determine what voting >methods are being used in swing states and which are evoting without >audit trails. Post your data under the individual state responses >below. > >------------------------------------------- > >Kerry is well ahead in exit polls, but still losing the counts. WTH >is going on? > >Kerry is well ahead in Exit Polling in Ohio. We're being screwed. > >http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/O... > >Male: 51/49 Kerry 47% >Female: 53/47 Kerry 53% > >Dem: 91/8 Kerry 38% >Rep: 94/6 Bush 37% >Ind: 60/39 Kerry 24% > > >Here is exit polling for Florida (3,824,794 votes for Kerry & Bush) > >http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/F... > >Male: 52/47 Kerry 46% >Female: 52/48 Kerry 54% > >Dem: 86/13 Kerry 38% >Rep: 92/7 Bush 39% >Ind: 60/38 Kerry 23% > >3,824,794 votes for Kerry & Bush >2065388 Women (54% of total) >1759405 Men (46% of total) > >Bush leads male vote by 5% of M = 87970 > >Kerry leads female vote by 4% of M = 82615 > >That means Bush is ahead by just 5355 votes in exit polling in FL. > >Another odd thing is that there are more Reps then Dems in Florida >by 1%, which is not expected. Either there are more voting >Republicans in FL than Democrats, a first and not matching known >statistics, or more Republicans were exit polled than Democrats. If >the exit poll is off by just 1% that's a difference of 382479 more >voters who are Democracts. > >The results being posted however show Bush ahead 326,000 actual >votes. This is simply not possible from the exit polling numbers. >Even skewed for a 5% higher Republican vs. Democrat turnout from >2000, it doesn't add up. > > >WISCONSIN: > >Kerry leads Female voters by 7%, Bush leads male voters by 7%. Male >vs. Female voter turnout is 47% M, 53% F. That means Kerry >statistically has a 7% edge in exit polling in Wisconsin. > >Actual results however show Bush ahead by 1%, an unexplained difference of 8%. > >NEVADA: > >Just checked, same pattern. Kerry leads in the exit polls by a clear >margin, but is still behind in the reported results. This state is >even closer. Actual is just 1% favor of Bush. Exit polls show Kerry >with a wider margin. Women favored Kerry by 8% here out of 52% of >total voters. Men favored Bush by just 6% out of 48% of total >voters. Actual reported results don't match exit polling AT ALL in >Nevada. > >*** KERRY leads by 1.3% in exit polls in NV *** > >Can someone determine what percentage of precincts are DIEBOLD or >electronic voting machines in these swing states? Of those compare >the expected voting results from Male vs. Female against the results >reported by electronic vs. non-electronic voting places. > >My HYPOTHESIS is we will find a discrepancy in the electronic >systems vs. the exit polls and the non-electronic systems. > >ttp://www.democraticunderground.com >/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add >ress=132x1295396 > > > >How The Election Was Stolen > >From Roz Hill >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >11-3-4 > >I watched the election results all night and into this morning. >There are some very important issues to share. > >One is the surprise expressed by the pundits wherein they >acknowledge that the massive voter drives were propelled by >discontent. So how did the most hated occupant of the White House >manage to exceed his 45% poll average to now claim he has a huge >"popular" win. > >We are told that 22% voted on "morality" and that Bush took 80% of >that 22%, and that is how he won. However, that leaves 78% who were >focused on Kerry issues. Why aren,t we told the percentages of the >78%??? > >The second surprise for the media was that the results didn,t match >the exit polls AT ALL. The media has gracefully claimed they "just >got it wrong." You remember we didn,t have exit pollsters in 2002. >It saved any disagreement with THAT Republican "sweep." In fact, the >pollsters have always been 100% accurate, with just 1 to 2% polling >data, in legitimate elections. Bush took the Texas governorship from >Ann Richards when she had a 70% approval rating. Is it magic? > >My "I TOLD YOU SO" is that I have SCREAMED since 2000 that if we >don,t get rid of touch-screen "voting" computers, NOTHING, NOTHING, >NOTHING else will matter. > >So, here are the numbers (so far): 112,596,922 voters counted in the >presidential race. Bush has been consistently polling at 45%, which >SHOULD have given him 50,668,614 votes, instead of 58,073,612. This >translates into 7,404,998 votes being siphoned off from Kerry votes. >Now, how does that magic work??? > >Taxpayers get hit with a bill for $3600 (or more) for EACH of the >touch-screen "voting" computers, which are nothing more than >dedicated COUNTERS except that they are marketed by Republicans (who >vowed to ensure Bush,s victory); and the American people have not >been allowed to examine or certify the software in these units. > >Here is how easy it is to "make magic" > >-- we need COUNTERS - (B) = Bush; (K) = Kerry; (V) = Vote; (T) = Tally > >1. If V = B, add 1 to B >2. If T = 8, add 1 to B; Clear T; Skip 3 >3. If V = K, add 1 to K; Add 1 to T > >This extremely simple bit of programming would shift 12% of the vote >from Kerry to Bush, it would defy exit polls, and it would make it >look like Bush had a huge popular win. It is time that the software >in these SECRET Republican-owned computers be examined with a >deliberate check for instructions that could modify the vote tally. > >Al-Qaeda has previously regarded the American people as victims of a >crooked election in 2000. Now they regard Americans as responsible >for letting this man -- who is regarded as the worst terrorist on >the planet continue his tyrannous regime. I doubt that the rest of >the world will accept four more years of his lies and looting. > >Roz Hill > > > > >Disclaimer > >Email This Article > > > > >MainPage >http://www.rense.com > > >This Site Served by TheHostPros
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/7gSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
