Just back from a wonderful visit with friends and family and want to retain some of the warmth and vision such occasions. So here's some of that. Ed
A Radical in the White House By Bob Herbert OP-ED COLUMNIST The New York Times - April 18, 2005 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/18/opinion/18herbert.html Last week - April 12, to be exact - was the 60th anniversary of the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. "I have a terrific headache," he said, before collapsing at the Little White House in Warm Springs, Ga. He died of a massive cerebral hemorrhage on the 83rd day of his fourth term as president. His hold on the nation was such that most Americans, stunned by the announcement of his death that spring afternoon, reacted as though they had lost a close relative. That more wasn't made of this anniversary is not just a matter of time; it's a measure of the distance the U.S. has traveled from the egalitarian ideals championed by F.D.R. His goal was "to make a country in which no one is left out." That kind of thinking has long since been consigned to the political dumpster. We're now in the age of Bush, Cheney and DeLay, small men committed to the concentration of big bucks in the hands of the fortunate few. To get a sense of just how radical Roosevelt was (compared with the politics of today), consider the State of the Union address he delivered from the White House on Jan. 11, 1944. He was already in declining health and, suffering from a cold, he gave the speech over the radio in the form of a fireside chat. After talking about the war, which was still being fought on two fronts, the president offered what should have been recognized immediately for what it was, nothing less than a blueprint for the future of the United States. It was the clearest statement I've ever seen of the kind of nation the U.S. could have become in the years between the end of World War II and now. Roosevelt referred to his proposals in that speech as "a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race or creed." Among these rights, he said, are: "The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation. "The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation. "The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living. "The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad. "The right of every family to a decent home. "The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health. "The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident and unemployment. "The right to a good education." I mentioned this a few days ago to an acquaintance who is 30 years old. She said, "Wow, I can't believe a president would say that." Roosevelt's vision gave conservatives in both parties apoplexy in 1944 and it would still drive them crazy today. But the truth is that during the 1950's and 60's the nation made substantial progress toward his wonderfully admirable goals, before the momentum of liberal politics slowed with the war in Vietnam and the election in 1968 of Richard Nixon. It wouldn't be long before Ronald Reagan was, as the historian Robert Dallek put it, attacking Medicare as "the advance wave of socialism" and Dick Cheney, from a seat in Congress, was giving the thumbs down to Head Start. Mr. Cheney says he has since seen the light on Head Start. But his real idea of a head start is to throw government money at people who already have more cash than they know what to do with. He's one of the leaders of the G.O.P. gang (the members should all wear masks) that has executed a wholesale transfer of wealth via tax cuts from working people to the very rich. Roosevelt was far from a perfect president, but he gave hope and a sense of the possible to a nation in dire need. And he famously warned against giving in to fear. The nation is now in the hands of leaders who are experts at exploiting fear, and indifferent to the needs and hopes, even the suffering, of ordinary people. "The test of our progress," said Roosevelt, "is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." Sixty years after his death we should be raising a toast to F.D.R. and his progressive ideas. And we should take that opportunity to ask: How in the world did we allow ourselves to get from there to here? E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company *** Nurses Union Leader Is a Tonic for Governor's Foes Rose Ann DeMoro has led the fight against Schwarzenegger's staffing and pension policies. So far, she appears to be winning. By Paul Pringle Times Staff Writer April 17, 2005 Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/news/local/state/la-me-nurses17apr17,1,3193092.story?ctrack=1&cset=true OAKLAND — Her name is Rose Ann DeMoro, but in Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office she might be better known as Trouble. DeMoro is the 56-year-old, Missouri-born, Bruce Springsteen-loving executive director of the California Nurses Assn., a 60,000-member labor union that has led the fight against much of Schwarzenegger's policy agenda. In David-vs.-Goliath fashion, the battle appears to be going DeMoro's way. "He was on a roll, he was unassailable, and people told us we couldn't take him on," said DeMoro, sitting in a fourth-floor conference room at the association's brick headquarters here. Two Schwarzenegger bobble-head dolls, one labeled "Governor Girlie Man," roosted on her desk. "We take extreme credit for his poll numbers dropping like a rock," DeMoro said. Schwarzenegger's once-soaring approval ratings have indeed plunged, and his sweeping proposals to revamp state government have stalled. He can't seem to attend a fundraiser free of boisterous union protesters, with chanting nurses often in the front ranks. And one of his favorite lines for diminishing his opponents — "I am always kicking their butts" — has come back to haunt him, thanks to angry RNs mobilized by DeMoro. In December, Schwarzenegger used the taunt to belittle nurses who picketed his speech at a Long Beach women's conference. He lumped them in with Sacramento's "special interests." His remarks proved to be a rallying cry for DeMoro and her devoted troops, who have grown accustomed to victory. During DeMoro's 12 years heading the association, the union has defied labor-movement trends by tripling its membership. In the face-off with Schwarzenegger, the association has staged about 40 attention-grabbing demonstrations up and down the state and as far away as Ohio, where sign-waving nurses tailed him to a bodybuilding exhibition. The protesters have railed primarily against his attempts to block an association-sponsored law that requires more nurses in California hospitals. The union contends that Schwarzenegger has gone after the law at the behest of the hospital industry. The governor has said a nursing shortage prevents hospitals from meeting the ratios. Another target of the demonstrations has been his bid to privatize pensions for public workers, including nurses employed by the state. Schwarzenegger has withdrawn the pension proposal. And an appellate court has upheld a Sacramento judge's injunction suspending the governor's order derailing the new nurse-to-patient ratios. The union's lawsuit to permanently invalidate the order is pending. It may have been unions representing firefighters, police officers and teachers that forced Schwarzenegger to retreat on the pension measure. But DeMoro supporters and critics — and she has plenty of the latter — agree her association took the lead. The tide turned when Schwarzenegger egged on the nurses, and unleashed her fervor for street-level activism. "It all started with her and the association," said Ralph Nader, the consumer advocate and former presidential candidate. Nader worked with DeMoro on an unsuccessful 1996 ballot initiative that would have limited the power of HMOs. "She's showing what some moxie can achieve," Nader said. He added that the association "is probably the most authentic labor union in the country today." Allan Hoffenblum, a Republican strategist in Los Angeles, is no fan of DeMoro and her association, which he described as "very hard-core liberal." But he acknowledged DeMoro's effectiveness. "When Arnold attacked those nurses, he just fell into a trap, and there's no doubt the nurses outflanked him," Hoffenblum said. Schwarzenegger declined an interview request. His spokesman, Rob Stutzman, downplayed the role of DeMoro's group in the governor's fall in the polls. "All they're doing is riding on Arnold Schwarzenegger's back to show the rest of the country that they are aggressive union organizers," said Stutzman, who noted that DeMoro is trying to unionize nurses outside California. " … The more hysterical and over-the-top they are, the more publicity they get for themselves." DeMoro's foes in the hospital industry agree. Some denounce her as a "radical" who engages in intimidation tactics, twists the facts and sullies the nursing profession. They point out that she has never been a nurse. Before joining the association staff 19 years ago, DeMoro organized Hollywood producers for the Teamsters. She began working for unions after leaving a UC Santa Barbara graduate program in women's studies. Jan Emerson, spokeswoman for the California Hospital Assn., said the nurses union has been "impossible to deal with" under DeMoro. Emerson said a demonstration at the hospital association's Sacramento offices in 2001 turned ugly, with protesters bursting through doors and threatening to urinate on the carpet if they were not allowed to use the bathroom. "We were astounded that professional nurses would do this," Emerson said. Union spokesman Charles Idelson disputed Emerson's account, saying the nurses behaved properly. DeMoro, whose parents ran a beauty parlor and pizza restaurant in St. Louis, received a salary of about $175,000 last fiscal year, according to documents the union filed with the U.S. Labor Department. The association also employs her husband, Don DeMoro, as a researcher, paying him about $100,000 last year, the records show. The union has cited Don DeMoro's work in pressing for legislation such as the ratios law. Some of the association's detractors have questioned the credibility of his research because of the spousal relationship. Don DeMoro also heads a small research institute that the union's lawyer, James Eggleston, said has "evolved" into an arm of the union. State officials say the Institute for Health and Socio-Economic Policy has run afoul of regulations for filing tax returns and related disclosures. In 2002, the California Franchise Tax Board suspended the institute from doing business because the organization had not filed state tax returns since 1997, said board spokesman John Barrett. "They need to bring themselves back into good standing," Barrett said. Eggleston said the failure to file the tax returns and other documents was a clerical oversight that would be corrected. "Somebody should have been paying attention," he said. He said Don DeMoro has not received any financial benefit from the institute in many years. Don DeMoro did not return telephone calls about the institute. Dismissing any suggestion of nepotism or conflict of interest, Idelson and union officials said Don DeMoro's research is worth every penny of his salary. "He's an exemplary researcher," Idelson said. "His studies have been models for other organizations." But Kent Wong, director of the UCLA Center for Labor Research and Education, said Don DeMoro's employment by his wife's union "raises eyebrows," no matter the quality of his research. "It just doesn't look good." Meanwhile, the National Labor Relations Board last year overturned an organizing election the association had won at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. The board found that the 2002 election had been tainted because two antiunion nurses had received anonymous telephone threats against their families and pets. Idelson said the association had nothing to do with the Cedars-Sinai threats and the board's finding reflected the Bush administration's antipathy toward unions. The association has won more than 65 elections on DeMoro's watch, while losing about a half-dozen, Idelson said. He said it represents about 45% of hospital nurses in California; 61% of the 297,000 nurses licensed in the state work in hospitals. Outside the Ritz-Carlton in San Francisco recently, DeMoro was in her element as the association and other unions picketed a Schwarzenegger fundraiser. Springsteen's "Born in the USA" blared from loudspeakers. Overhead, a plane hired by the union trailed a banner that read "Arnold: California Is Not For Sale." Slogans on placards referred to allegations that Schwarzenegger had groped unwilling women in the past. Demonstrators clogged the streets in every direction, hurling insults at well-dressed contributors arriving at the fundraiser: "Corporate scum! Shame on you!" Nurses at the protest spoke glowingly of DeMoro. "She's actually my hero," said Deborah Burger, a Santa Rosa nurse who is the elected president of the association. Jenny McGrane, a San Francisco nurse, said DeMoro is a "very positive public voice" for the union. DeMoro says the union's triumphs flow from the crusade-like resolve of its 30 part-time directors, all working nurses, as well as a "women's culture" that emphasizes collaboration, rather than competition, within the association hierarchy. The membership is more than 90% female. DeMoro brands Schwarzenegger a "bullying" sexist. "I think he sees women as completely subservient," she said. At union headquarters, she lifted one of the bobble-head dolls from her desk and dropped it accidentally. It snapped in two. "I broke his head off," DeMoro said, retrieving the pieces. "Do you think that's symbolic?" If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. TMS Reprints Article licensing and reprint options Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times portside (the left side in nautical parlance) is a news, discussion and debate service of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. It aims to provide varied material of interest to people on the left. To subscribe: http://lists.portside.org/mailman/listinfo/portside ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Help save the life of a child. Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's 'Thanks & Giving.' http://us.click.yahoo.com/mGEjbB/5WnJAA/E2hLAA/7gSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
