Headless

Aug 3rd 2006 | NEW YORK
>From The Economist print edition

"This part is always screwed up with a conductor, but we've played it perfectly 
twice," concludes Leon Fleisher during a recent Orpheus Chamber Orchestra 
rehearsal of Beethoven's "Emperor" Concerto. "This is proof that conductors 
should just sit down."

In the dictatorial world of orchestras-where conductors choose the repertoire, 
organise rehearsals and tell musicians how to play-Orpheus is fond of proving 
that it thrives without a baton. Whereas the first violinists in other 
ensembles, such as the Prague and Australian chamber orchestras, are de facto 
conductors, Orpheus rotates leadership in an artistically collaborative version 
of musical chairs. A different core group shapes each piece and then works with 
the whole ensemble. Initially, this chaotic democracy resulted in inefficient 
rehearsals and bruised egos, but a recent rehearsal of a Bach orchestral suite 
suggests that it is now an efficient and civilised process, if long.

Soloists hesitate sometimes about playing with Orpheus, but then enjoy the rare 
chance to voice their own ideas. The orchestra does not pay huge fees, but it 
does require almost twice as many rehearsals, which Mr Fleisher says leads to 
deeper music making. "Everyone knows the standard repertory and most orchestras 
are wonderful sight readers. But they don't have time to get behind the notes."

Orpheus proves that size is less important than vigour, and its string 
section's lush, powerful sound belies its small stature. The broad repertoire 
ranges from Bach to Schönberg. Despite the complex tempo fluctuations of music 
of the 19th century, when concertmaster-led orchestras began to be replaced by 
composer-conductors, Orpheus convincingly performs romantic music including 
Mendelssohn and Schubert symphonies, and Chopin piano concertos. Next season it 
even plans to perform a Schumann symphony.

"We are trying to stay true to the composer and the sound they had in mind," 
says Ronnie Bauch, a violinist. For that reason, Orpheus does not play the big 
Mahler, Bruckner or Tchaikovsky symphonies. Orpheus musicians rely on being 
able to see and hear each other, and limit their ensemble to approximately 40 
players. 

Some conductors do not agree that their services might be dispensable. Benjamin 
Zander, known for his mesmerising Mahler recordings with the Philharmonia, says 
"the greatest and most subtle orchestral music must be guided by one mind. A 
collective mind is unlikely to produce the level of subtlety and musicianship 
that one mind will produce."

What Orpheus does produce are performances that are rarely humdrum, unlike all 
too many big-name orchestras. Playing without a conductor is risky, but the 
free-spirited energy of these keenly attentive musicians results in an edgy 
spontaneity. Eric Bartlett, a cellist with Orpheus and the New York 
Philharmonic Orchestra says there is a lower level of individual intensity in 
the latter. "If even a great conductor is empowered to make all the important 
decisions musicians start to play in a more passive way. Orpheus has removed a 
barrier between the audience and the music, the conductor himself."

So why aren't there more conductor-less orchestras? Star conductors sell more 
tickets than co-operatives. And then there is the difficulty of establishing a 
successful collaboration between many opinionated musicians. Orpheus has begun 
leading workshops at the Manhattan and Juilliard schools of music, and students 
are learning at first hand about some of the difficulties that Orpheus has 
taken years to overcome. "Sometimes I'm tired and don't feel like thinking and 
just want someone to guide me," says one student clarinettist. "On the other 
hand, conductors often aren't inspiring and just get in the way."

Listening to a brilliant conductor leading a superb orchestra is very special. 
Even Orpheus members admit it can be thrilling working with energetic and 
inspiring maestros. But as orchestras struggle to redefine themselves, a few 
brave Juilliard and Manhattan students could do worse than follow the Orpheus 
example. 

http://economist.com/books/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7246109


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to